|
Enric Sullà, Universitat Auṭnoma de Barcelona
Description
The course will study the process of adaptation that narrative
texts undergo in order to become films. Shooting a film out
of a narrative text usually implies that changes have to be
made in it either for technical or industrial reasons. The
film poses not only the classic problem of fidelity to the
so-called original but stylistic and thematic transformations
brought about by film genre, visual language and director
intervention.
The course would combine short lectures on
theoretical problems and seminars where the class will engage
in practical criticism of a narrative texts and its film adaptation.
Even more, the course will open with a practical case –the
study of a film’s sequence in order to introduce both
theoretical problems and analytic tools. It should be clear
that the aim of the course is to enable the students to produce
a comparative exam of a narrative and its adaptation into
a film. Topics dealt with will be the some basic notions of
narrative theory as applied both to narratives and films (action,
history and plot, narrator and point of view, style and tone,
theme), the comparative approach itself, and general problems
and processes of adaptation, bearing always in mind that between
narrative and its film adaptation there is a script.
The students would be required to discuss
either individually or by groups at least one narrative text
and the film adaptation during the course.
The course does require some knowledge of
the basic concepts of narrative theory and film language.
Each chosen film would be showed -partly or
entirely- and discussed in the classroom in parallel to the
story or novel from which it has been adapted. The films will
mainly be adaptations from short stories or novellas, but
some novels will be included too. Among the cinema adaptations
–chosen from a variety of genres- to be to shown there
will be: E. Hemingway’s “The killers” and
Robert Siodmak’s film; R. Chandler’s The Big Sleep
and H. Hawks film; the stories by G. de Maupassant (“Boule
de suif”) and E. Haycox filmed by J. Ford as Stagecoach;
W. Irving’s “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”
and Tim Burton’s film; Daphne du Maurier’s “The
Birds” and A. Hitchcock’s film; and Thomas Mann’s
Death in Venice and Luchino Visconti’s film.
Evaluation
The evaluation would take into account: class participation
(10%), a short paper delivered to the class (25%) and a paper
delivered at the end of term (65%). The short paper would
analyse an aspect of either a short story or a novel and its
film adaptation; the final one is expected to be an extended
comparison between both narratives. The students would always
be required to previously submit the outline of both papers
to the professor.
Reading list
a) Required reading
David Bordwell (1985), Narration in the fiction film,
London, Routledge, 1993
Jakob Lothe (2000), Narrative in fiction and film,
Oxford, Oxford UP
Brian McFarlane (1996), Novel into film: An introduction
to the theory of adaptation, Oxford, Clarendon Press
Linda Seger (1992), The art of adapting: Turning fact
and fiction into film, New York, Henry Holt
b) Further reading
David Bordwell & Kristin Thompson (1993), Film art:
An introduction, New York, McGraw-Hill (4th edition)
Deborah Cartmell & Imelda Whelehan (eds.) (1999),
Adaptations: From text to screen, screen to text, London,
Routledge
Deborah Cartmell et alii (eds.) (2000), Classics in film
and fiction, London, Pluto
Seymour Chatman (1978), Story and discourse: Narrative
structure in fiction and film, Ithaca, Cornell UP
Nick Lacey (2000), Narrative and genre, London, Macmillan.
David Lodge (1996), The practice of writing, Harmondsworth,
Penguin.
James Monaco ((1981), How to read a film, New York,
Oxford UP.
Robert Stam, Ernest Burgoyne & Sandy Flitterman-Lewis
(1992), New vocabularies in film semiotics, London,
Routledge.
John C. Tibbetts & James M. Welsh (eds.) (1999), Novels
into film: The encyclopedia of movies adapted from books,
New York, Checkmark
|